Key Finding
Acupuncture was the most effective non-pharmacological intervention for pelvic pain in women with endometriosis (SMD = −4.53; SUCRA = 99.1%), while physical therapy ranked highest for overall pain relief and dysmenorrhea.
Endometriosis is a chronic condition affecting millions of women, causing persistent pelvic pain, painful periods, and a reduced quality of life. For many women, medications and surgery don't fully address these challenges — or come with side effects they'd rather avoid. That's why researchers have been looking more closely at non-drug approaches, including acupuncture, exercise, physical therapy, nutritional supplements, and psychological support.
A major new study published in the Journal of Pain Research analyzed 33 clinical trials involving 2,323 women to compare how well these non-pharmacological therapies actually work. The researchers used a sophisticated method called a network meta-analysis, which allowed them to rank and compare all of these treatments against each other at the same time.
The results were encouraging — and specific. Acupuncture stood out as the most effective treatment for pelvic pain, with a remarkably strong effect compared to conventional care alone. Physical therapy ranked highest for reducing overall pain and painful periods (dysmenorrhea). Both acupuncture and physical therapy also significantly improved quality of life scores.
What does this mean if you're living with endometriosis? It suggests that adding acupuncture to your care plan — especially if pelvic pain is your primary concern — could make a meaningful difference. Acupuncture is thought to help by reducing inflammation, calming the nervous system, and improving blood flow to the pelvic region. Importantly, these benefits were seen on top of conventional care, meaning acupuncture works well as a complement to, not a replacement for, your current treatment.
Every woman's experience with endometriosis is different, so it's worth having an open conversation with your healthcare provider about whether acupuncture or physical therapy might be right for you. To get the best results, seek care from a licensed, qualified acupuncture practitioner with experience in women's health and pelvic pain conditions.
This network meta-analysis (NMA) of 33 RCTs (n = 2,323) evaluated the comparative effectiveness of five non-pharmacological interventions — acupuncture (ACU), exercise, nutritional supplementation, physical therapy (PHY), and psychological interventions — versus conventional care (CON) in women with endometriosis. Primary outcomes included overall pain, pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and quality of life (QoL).
ACU demonstrated the strongest effect for pelvic pain (SMD = −4.53; SUCRA = 99.1%), while PHY ranked highest for overall pain (SMD = −1.44; SUCRA = 74.4%) and dysmenorrhea (SMD = −1.30; SUCRA = 82.3%). Both ACU (SMD = 4.09) and PHY (SMD = 4.18) produced significant QoL improvements versus CON. No significant between-group differences emerged for anxiety outcomes.
Clinical takeaway: ACU and PHY offer distinct, subtype-specific analgesic advantages and should be considered for integration into multimodal endometriosis management pathways, particularly where pharmacological options are limited, declined, or insufficiently effective.
Browse our directory of verified licensed practitioners near you.
Find a practitioner →📌 PHN patients show convergent structural gray matter reductions and functional hyperactivation across thalamic, putaminal, cerebellar, and cingulate networks, identifying candidate neuroimaging biomarkers for central sensitization and pain chronicization.
📌 Acupuncture produced significant, clinically meaningful reductions in chronic pain scores while simultaneously modulating key pain-processing brain regions — including the ACC, insula, thalamus, and default mode network — across 17 high-quality RCTs involving 750 patients.
📌 Ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection combined with acupotomy release of the transverse carpal ligament produced significantly greater improvements in symptom severity, hand function, and median nerve morphology at 1 and 3 months compared to corticosteroid injection alone in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.